Hilgeford v. American International Group, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Hilgeford v. American International Group, Inc.

352 F. App'x 776

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 19, 2009·No. No. 09-1828·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Matthew J. Hilgeford, who proceeds in forma pauperis, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action against Defendants under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Hilgeford v. Am. Int’l Group, Inc., No. 3:09-cv-00440-JRS (E.D.Va. July 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Matthew J. Hilgeford, who proceeds in forma pauperis, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action against Defendants under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Hilgeford v. Am. Int’l Group, Inc., No. 3:09-cv-00440-JRS (E.D.Va. July 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hilgeford v. American International Group, Inc., 352 F. App'x 776 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

352 F. App'x 776 (Hilgeford v. American International Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related