Hilf v. Gelbelman
This text of 6 A.D.3d 497 (Hilf v. Gelbelman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Joel Arbisser appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), dated February 19, 2003, which denied his motion, inter alia, to restore the action to “active status.”
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
As this Court has already determined, the instant action was withdrawn (see Arbisser v Gelbelman, 286 AD2d 693, 694 [2001]). Therefore, it may not be restored to “active status” and the motion for that relief was properly denied. Prudenti, P.J., Florio, H. Miller, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 A.D.3d 497, 774 N.Y.S.2d 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilf-v-gelbelman-nyappdiv-2004.