Hile v. City of Cleveland

Supreme Court

Hile v. City of Cleveland

266 U.S. 582, 45 S. Ct. 97

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 27, 1924

DocketNo. 84

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 U.S. 582 (Hile v. City of Cleveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hile v. City of Cleveland, 266 U.S. 582, 45 S. Ct. 97 (1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, upon authority of McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U. S. 168; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U. S. 239; Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U. S. 526; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144. Mr. [583]*583George D. Hile pro se.

Mr. Carl F. Shuler, Mr. Alfred Clum and Mr. H. H. McKeehan appeared for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, upon authority of McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U. S. 168; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U. S. 239; Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U. S. 526; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144. Mr. [583]*583George D. Hile pro se.

Mr. Carl F. Shuler, Mr. Alfred Clum and Mr. H. H. McKeehan appeared for defendant in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 U.S. 582, 45 S. Ct. 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hile-v-city-of-cleveland-scotus-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack