Hildrith v. Harvey

2 Johns. Cas. 221

• Court: New York Supreme Court
• Decided: January 15, 1801
• Status: Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The rule having been regularly obtained by the defendant, without any fraud on his part, we cannot now set it aside, on the ground of the absence of counsel, whose duty it is to be steadily in court, during the term, without establishing a precedent that may be very inconvenient, and which may destroy a settled rule of practice. The equity between the parties is now equal. The plaintiff •regularly obtained a judgment by default. The defendant has regularly obtained a discharge of that judgment. As the money has been levied on the judgment, and is now in the hands of the plaintiff, we will not order him to pay it back to the defendant; but it must be brought into court to abide the final event of the suit.

Motion denied.(

a)

(a) Grah. Prac. 2d ed. 682.