Hildreth v. Lerche

10 N.Y.S. 238, 23 Abb. N. Cas. 428, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2463
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedNovember 7, 1889
StatusPublished

This text of 10 N.Y.S. 238 (Hildreth v. Lerche) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hildreth v. Lerche, 10 N.Y.S. 238, 23 Abb. N. Cas. 428, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2463 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Opinion

Holme, J.

I do not think the notice required by section 1309 applies to appeals taken from orders or decrees made by the surrogate. Article 4, tit. 2, c. 18, of the Code provides a complete system of appeals from orders or decrees made in the surrogate’s court, altogether distinct from the provisions in reference to appeals from other courts.' Section 2581 provides that the surrogate may at any time, in his discretion, authorize any person aggrieved to bring an action upon an undertaking given on appeal from an order or decree in his court, and this seems to be the only prerequisite to the cause of action provided for in the article of the Code relating to such appeals. The plaintiff in this case having been thus authorized to bring this action, I think the demurrer bad. Motion granted, with costs, and judgment may be entered by plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 N.Y.S. 238, 23 Abb. N. Cas. 428, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hildreth-v-lerche-nynyccityct-1889.