Hildreth v. Gwindon

10 Cal. 490
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 Cal. 490 (Hildreth v. Gwindon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hildreth v. Gwindon, 10 Cal. 490 (Cal. 1858).

Opinion

Field, J., delivered the opinion of the Court

Terry, C. J., concurring.

This case was brought to a Rearing in the absence of the respondent’s counsel, and the judgment reversed. The respondent now moves to set aside the judgment, and to reinstate the cause on the 'calendar, upon the ground that the record does not disclose any proof of service of the notice of appeal.

The motion must be granted. Unless it affirmatively appear in the record that a copy of the notice of appeal has been served upon the adverse party, or his attorney, we can not take jurisdiction of the case. (Practice Act, § 337; Franklin v. Reiner, 8 Cal., 340.)

In reinstating the cause, it is proper that the appellant should have leave to supply the omission in the record if any service was ever made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Snell v. Third Judicial District Court
103 P. 261 (Utah Supreme Court, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Cal. 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hildreth-v-gwindon-cal-1858.