Hilderbrandt v. Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co.
This text of 52 A.D. 634 (Hilderbrandt v. Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff’s exceptions sustained and motion for a new trial granted, with ‘ costs to the plaintiff to abide event. Held, that under the evidence in the case the questian as to whether there was an express contract upon the part of the defendant's intestate to pay the plaintiff for at least some of the services rendered by her, was a question for the jury. Ail concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 A.D. 634, 65 N.Y.S. 1135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilderbrandt-v-rochester-trust-safe-deposit-co-nyappdiv-1900.