Hildenbrandt v. Hall

269 P.2d 708, 129 Colo. 16, 1954 Colo. LEXIS 347
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided January 18, 1954·No. No. 17,200·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Clark

delivered the opinion of the court.

This matter, under consideration by us at the same time, under similar facts, and involving the same principles, as determined in cause No. 17,201, entitled Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. City and County of Denver, the decision on which is this day announced, is governed by the identical rules and principles therein set forth. In this case the reporter’s transcript was lodged with [17] the clerk of the trial court four days late, or sixty-four days after the entry of judgment, no application having been made for extension of time pursuant to Rule 6 (b), (R.C.P. Colo.) The reporter’s transcript is ordered stricken from the record on error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hildenbrandt v. Hall, 269 P.2d 708, 129 Colo. 16, 1954 Colo. LEXIS 347 (Colo. 1954).

269 P.2d 708 (Hildenbrandt v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BUSINESS & PRODUCT PROMOTION, INC. v. East Tincup, Inc.
389 P.2d 851 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1964)
Freeman v. Cross
305 P.2d 759 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1957)
King v. Williams
281 P.2d 163 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1955)