Hildenbrandt v. Hall

269 P.2d 708, 129 Colo. 16, 1954 Colo. LEXIS 347
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedJanuary 18, 1954
DocketNo. 17,200
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 269 P.2d 708 (Hildenbrandt v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hildenbrandt v. Hall, 269 P.2d 708, 129 Colo. 16, 1954 Colo. LEXIS 347 (Colo. 1954).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Clark

delivered the opinion of the court.

This matter, under consideration by us at the same time, under similar facts, and involving the same principles, as determined in cause No. 17,201, entitled Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. City and County of Denver, the decision on which is this day announced, is governed by the identical rules and principles therein set forth. In this case the reporter’s transcript was lodged with [17]*17the clerk of the trial court four days late, or sixty-four days after the entry of judgment, no application having been made for extension of time pursuant to Rule 6 (b), (R.C.P. Colo.) The reporter’s transcript is ordered stricken from the record on error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

BUSINESS & PRODUCT PROMOTION, INC. v. East Tincup, Inc.
389 P.2d 851 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1964)
Freeman v. Cross
305 P.2d 759 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1957)
King v. Williams
281 P.2d 163 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 P.2d 708, 129 Colo. 16, 1954 Colo. LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hildenbrandt-v-hall-colo-1954.