Hildenbrandt v. Hall
This text of 269 P.2d 708 (Hildenbrandt v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This matter, under consideration by us at the same time, under similar facts, and involving the same principles, as determined in cause No. 17,201, entitled Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. City and County of Denver, the decision on which is this day announced, is governed by the identical rules and principles therein set forth. In this case the reporter’s transcript was lodged with [17]*17the clerk of the trial court four days late, or sixty-four days after the entry of judgment, no application having been made for extension of time pursuant to Rule 6 (b), (R.C.P. Colo.) The reporter’s transcript is ordered stricken from the record on error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 P.2d 708, 129 Colo. 16, 1954 Colo. LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hildenbrandt-v-hall-colo-1954.