Hildebrandt v. Google LLC
Opinion
POWER DENSITY SOLUTIONS, LLC, Case No.: 24-cv-1437-RSH-JLB
Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING CASE v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE
[ECF No. 21] Defendant. On November 12, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. ECF No. 21. Defendant has not served an answer. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), a plaintiff has an “absolute right” to “voluntarily [] dismiss an action when the defendant has not yet served an answer or a summary judgment motion.” Am. Soccer Co. v. Score First Enterprises, 187 F.3d 1108, 1110 (9th Cir. 1999). A voluntary dismissal pursuant Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) is self-executing and requires no further action by the Court. United States v. 475 Martin Lane, 545 F.3d 1134, 1145 (9th Cir. 2008). In light of Plaintiff’s notice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be DISMISSED The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. ; Dated: November 13, 2024 fehw 7 ‘ Howe Hon. Robert S. Huie United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hildebrandt v. Google LLC (Hildebrandt v. Google LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.