Hildebrand v. State

29 S.W.2d 774, 115 Tex. Crim. 245, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 431
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 28, 1930·No. No. 12887.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

The offense is possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; the punishment confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The caption shows the court to have been convened May 27, 1929, and to have adjourned June 15, 1929. The trial appears to have been held on March 15, 1929, and sentence imposed on March 16, 1929, which was prior to the convening of the term of court as manifested by the caption. The proceedings not appearing to have *Page 247 been had during the term of court manifested by the caption, the state's motion to dismiss the appeal must be granted. Sherwood v. State, 225 S.W. 1101.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

HAWKINS, J., absent.

ON MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hildebrand v. State, 29 S.W.2d 774, 115 Tex. Crim. 245, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 431 (Tex. 1930).

29 S.W.2d 774 (Hildebrand v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilhelm v. State
426 S.W.2d 850 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Gilbert v. State
354 S.W.2d 939 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1962)
Hirsch v. State
90 S.W.2d 256 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Kiel v. State
83 S.W.2d 680 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Graham v. State
55 S.W.2d 826 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)