Hilda Fobb, Trinette Smith, Juanisha Winchester, Ravaughn Harris, Precious Diaz, and Quintosha Wishem v. Stericycle, Inc.
This text of Hilda Fobb, Trinette Smith, Juanisha Winchester, Ravaughn Harris, Precious Diaz, and Quintosha Wishem v. Stericycle, Inc. (Hilda Fobb, Trinette Smith, Juanisha Winchester, Ravaughn Harris, Precious Diaz, and Quintosha Wishem v. Stericycle, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
HILDA FOBB, TRINETTE * NO. 2023-C-0238 SMITH, JUANISHA WINCHESTER, RAVAUGHN * COURT OF APPEAL HARRIS, PRECIOUS DIAZ, AND QUINTOSHA WISHEM * FOURTH CIRCUIT
VERSUS * STATE OF LOUISIANA
STERICYCLE, INC. *
* *******
DYSART, J., DISSENTS
DLD I respectfully dissent from the majority. I would grant the writ and reverse
the trial court’s ruling.
Jennifer Hoisington is Stericycle’s Director of EHS Systems. She explained
in her affidavit that her duties include the management of the Safety and
Environmental Management System (SEMS). SEMS is a data management system
that Stericycle utilizes to track and report incident data for compliance and incident
prevention purposes. As such, its primary purpose is not for maintaining litigation,
insurance or claims documentation. SEMS is an external system, developed and
maintained by a third party vendor, AIC. Updates to SEMS were made by AIC in
approximately October 2018, June 2020 and February 2022. Following each of
these updates, some data concerning historical events was no longer available via
SEMS. Ms. Hoisington explained that the September 25, 2018 report regarding the
subject incident was generated from SEMS and then saved outside of SEMS as a
PDF before any changes were made to the SEMS data entry fields. Thus, although
some data is no longer accessible via SEMS, the evidence of the data has not been
destroyed, but copied and preserved in the September 2018 PDF report. That
report, identified as Exhibit” B” attached to defendant’s opposition to the motion
for sanctions, was provided to the plaintiffs by defendant in its discovery responses. As such, there has been no destruction, change or spoliation of
evidence.
For these reasons, I would grant the writ and reverse the ruling of the trial
court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hilda Fobb, Trinette Smith, Juanisha Winchester, Ravaughn Harris, Precious Diaz, and Quintosha Wishem v. Stericycle, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilda-fobb-trinette-smith-juanisha-winchester-ravaughn-harris-precious-lactapp-2023.