Hild v. McClintic-Marshall Co.

216 A.D. 770
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1926
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 216 A.D. 770 (Hild v. McClintic-Marshall Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hild v. McClintic-Marshall Co., 216 A.D. 770 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Order granting plaintiff’s motion to compel defendant to receive notice of appeal reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. We think the time to appeal from the judgment expired thirty days after service of a copy thereof on plaintiff’s attorney with notice of entry. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 612.) Plaintiff’s procedure to set aside the judgment resulting in an order which was thereafter reversed (Hild v. McClintic-Marshall Co., 215 App. Div. 780) did not operate to extend his time to appeal from the judgment. (Commercial Bank v. Sherwood, 162 N. Y. 310, 321; Brown v. Cleveland Trust Co., 233 id. 399, 406, citing Loeb v. Willis, 100 id. 231, 235.) Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mountain States Implement Co. v. Arave
2 P.2d 314 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1931)
Waterbury v. Nassor
130 Misc. 200 (New York County Courts, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 A.D. 770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hild-v-mcclintic-marshall-co-nyappdiv-1926.