Hilburn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hilburn v. State

415 So. 2d 896, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20473

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 29, 1982

DocketNo. 81-600

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 415 So. 2d 896 (Hilburn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hilburn v. State, 415 So. 2d 896, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20473 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was adjudicated guilty of burglary pursuant to a jury verdict finding him guilty of such charge.

Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction and sentence on the grounds that: (1) the court erred in denying appellant’s motion for mistrial and for a Richardson hearing based on the State’s failure to disclose the name of a witness and produce physical evidence; and (2) the court erred in denying his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.

We have carefully reviewed the record and considered appellant’s points on appeal and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. Clark v. State, 379 So.2d 97 (Fla.1979), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 936, 101 S.Ct. 1402, 67 L.Ed.2d 371 (1981); Leeman v. State, 357 So.2d 703 (Fla.1978); Cooper v. State, 336 So.2d 1133 (Fla.1976).

The judgment and sentence appealed are affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI