Hilburn v. Paysinger

17 S.C.L. 97
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedMay 15, 1828
StatusPublished

This text of 17 S.C.L. 97 (Hilburn v. Paysinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hilburn v. Paysinger, 17 S.C.L. 97 (N.C. Ct. App. 1828).

Opinion

Johnson, J.

The object of creating the summary jurisdiction was to avoid the expense and delay incident to formal and [98]*98technical pleading; and hence in that jurisdiction the plaintiff has always been permitted to state his case in the most concise manner. The form adopted im the present instance I found in use five and twenty years ago, and it is in conformity with the practice in other cases within the summary jurisdiction. I have neither seen nor heard of any evils growing out of that practice; and I know of no reason why it should be now remodelled. The motion to set aside the nonsuit is granted.

Nott, J. and Colcock, J. concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 S.C.L. 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilburn-v-paysinger-ncctapp-1828.