Hilburn v. Hilburn
30 S.E. 656, 105 Ga. 471, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 557
Opinion
The-right of a party to have his case opened for the purpose of introducing other testimony after the argument before the jury has begun rests largely in the discretion of the trial judge, and his refusal to admit such testimony will not be controlled in a ease where the evidence tendered is of doubtful admissibility.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hilburn v. Hilburn, 30 S.E. 656, 105 Ga. 471, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 557 (Ga. 1898).
30 S.E. 656 (Hilburn v. Hilburn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strickland v. State
41 S.E. 713 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)