Hilbreth v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hilbreth v. State

1914 OK CR 95, 140 P. 435, 10 Okla. Crim. 694, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 184

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 25, 1914

DocketNo. A-2189.

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK CR 95 (Hilbreth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hilbreth v. State, 1914 OK CR 95, 140 P. 435, 10 Okla. Crim. 694, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 184 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Hilbreth, plaintiff in error, was convicted in the county court of McCurtain county of a violation of the prohibitory law, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury, he was on the 18th day of July, 1913, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a term of thirty days and to pay a fine of fifty dollars. To reverse this judgment an appeal was attempted to be taken by filing in this courtf on February 16, 1914, a petition in error with case-made. On March 10, 1914, the Attorney General filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the same was not filed in this court until long after the expiration of the time allowed by law in which an appeal could be taken in a misdemeanor case. It appearing from the record that the petition in .error and case-made were not filed in this court until three or four months after the limit fixed by law for taking an appeal had expired, the motion to dismiss is well taken. The purported appeal herein is therefore dismissed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Robert Hilbreth, plaintiff in error, was convicted in the county court of McCurtain county of a violation of the prohibitory law, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury, he was on the 18th day of July, 1913, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a term of thirty days and to pay a fine of fifty dollars. To reverse this judgment an appeal was attempted to be taken by filing in this courtf on February 16, 1914, a petition in error with case-made. On March 10, 1914, the Attorney General filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the same was not filed in this court until long after the expiration of the time allowed by law in which an appeal could be taken in a misdemeanor case. It appearing from the record that the petition in .error and case-made were not filed in this court until three or four months after the limit fixed by law for taking an appeal had expired, the motion to dismiss is well taken. The purported appeal herein is therefore dismissed, and the cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK CR 95, 140 P. 435, 10 Okla. Crim. 694, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilbreth-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.