Hilbrandt v. George E. Mole & Sons, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hilbrandt v. George E. Mole & Sons, Inc.

282 A.D. 892, 124 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5350

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 26, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D. 892 (Hilbrandt v. George E. Mole & Sons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hilbrandt v. George E. Mole & Sons, Inc., 282 A.D. 892, 124 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5350 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Consolidated actions to recover damages for injuries to person and property. The jury rendered a verdict, in Action Ho. 1, for $30,000 in favor of plaintiff Dorothea Hilbrandt and against the defendants, and in favor of said defendants against plaintiff Louis Hilbrandt. In'Action Ho. 2, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendant, Louis Hilbrandt. Defendants in Action Ho. 1 appeal from the judgment entered thereon insofar as it is in favor of plaintiff Dorothea Hilbrandt. Plaintiff in Action Ho. 2 appeals from said judgment insofar as it is in favor of the defendant in that action. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. Ho opinion. Present — Holán, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Consolidated actions to recover damages for injuries to person and property. The jury rendered a verdict, in Action Ho. 1, for $30,000 in favor of plaintiff Dorothea Hilbrandt and against the defendants, and in favor of said defendants against plaintiff Louis Hilbrandt. In'Action Ho. 2, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendant, Louis Hilbrandt. Defendants in Action Ho. 1 appeal from the judgment entered thereon insofar as it is in favor of plaintiff Dorothea Hilbrandt. Plaintiff in Action Ho. 2 appeals from said judgment insofar as it is in favor of the defendant in that action. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. Ho opinion. Present — Holán, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 892, 124 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilbrandt-v-george-e-mole-sons-inc-nyappdiv-1953.