Hilborn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hilborn v. State

692 So. 2d 991, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4878, 1997 WL 222362

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 6, 1997

DocketNo. 96-1243

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 692 So. 2d 991 (Hilborn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hilborn v. State, 692 So. 2d 991, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4878, 1997 WL 222362 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Steven Frank Hilbom (Hilbom) pled nolo contendere to a charge of aggravated battery and was sentenced to four years in prison followed by three years of probation. The Public Defender filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Hilborn waived his right to file a pro se brief. We have reviewed the record and agree with the Public Defender that no good faith argument can be made that error occurred in the trial court.

We accordingly affirm Hilborn’s judgment and sentence. We note, however, that the written “Court Cost Order” does not reflect the oral pronouncement of restitution, which the trial judge determined to be $627.25. We therefore remand solely for the purpose of correcting the scrivener’s error, to assure that the written order reflects the amount of restitution Hilbom is required to pay.

AFFIRMED.

MINER, LAWRENCE and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI