Hiland v. Forrest

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Hiland v. Forrest

257 N.W. 663, 193 Minn. 10, 1934 Minn. LEXIS 680

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedDecember 7, 1934

DocketNo. 29,920.

StatusPublished

This text of 257 N.W. 663 (Hiland v. Forrest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hiland v. Forrest, 257 N.W. 663, 193 Minn. 10, 1934 Minn. LEXIS 680 (Mich. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Certiorari to review a decision of the industrial commission awarding compensation to employe, James J. Hiland. It is conceded that the employe was entitled to compensation, and no ques *11 tion is raised as to the amount thereof. The only question is as to which of two persons (each having an insurer) was the employer. The commission concluded that relator Forrest was such employer and that he and his insurer should pay the compensation awarded. The conclusion reached had ample support in the evidence and should not be disturbed. A recital of the evidence would not benefit the litigants or the profession.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Certiorari to review a decision of the industrial commission awarding compensation to employe, James J. Hiland. It is conceded that the employe was entitled to compensation, and no ques *11 tion is raised as to the amount thereof. The only question is as to which of two persons (each having an insurer) was the employer. The commission concluded that relator Forrest was such employer and that he and his insurer should pay the compensation awarded. The conclusion reached had ample support in the evidence and should not be disturbed. A recital of the evidence would not benefit the litigants or the profession.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 N.W. 663, 193 Minn. 10, 1934 Minn. LEXIS 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hiland-v-forrest-minn-1934.