Hilaire v. State
778 So. 2d 479, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1863, 2001 WL 167266
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 2001·No. No. 4D99-4067·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Affirmed. See Bentley v. State, 501 So.2d 600, 602 (Fla.1987); Watson v. State, 437 So.2d 702, 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (stating that “the legislature did not intend to require a finding that an operable handgun be involved in order to sustain a conviction of robbery with a firearm”), modified on other grounds, 453 So.2d 810 (Fla.1984).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hilaire v. State, 778 So. 2d 479, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1863, 2001 WL 167266 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
778 So. 2d 479 (Hilaire v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McMillan v. State
832 So. 2d 946 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)