Hilaire v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hilaire v. New York City Transit Authority

204 A.D.2d 546, 614 N.Y.S.2d 196, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5233

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 16, 1994·Published

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 to vacate an arbitration award, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated May 19, 1992, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the petitioner has no standing to challenge the arbitration award at issue (see, Berlyn v Board of Educ., 80 AD2d 572, 573). In any event, we find no basis to vacate or modify the award (see, CPLR 7511). Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 to vacate an arbitration award, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated May 19, 1992, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the petitioner has no standing to challenge the arbitration award at issue (see, Berlyn v Board of Educ., 80 AD2d 572, 573). In any event, we find no basis to vacate or modify the award (see, CPLR 7511). Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Hilaire v. New York City Transit Authority, 204 A.D.2d 546, 614 N.Y.S.2d 196, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5233 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

204 A.D.2d 546 (Hilaire v. New York City Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related