Hilaire v. New York City Transit Authority
This text of 204 A.D.2d 546 (Hilaire v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 to vacate an arbitration award, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated May 19, 1992, which dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the petitioner has no standing to challenge the arbitration award at issue (see, Berlyn v Board of Educ., 80 AD2d 572, 573). In any event, we find no basis to vacate or modify the award (see, CPLR 7511). Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 A.D.2d 546, 614 N.Y.S.2d 196, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilaire-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1994.