Higuerra v. Bernal
46 Cal. 580
This text of 46 Cal. 580 (Higuerra v. Bernal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Higuerra v. Bernal, 46 Cal. 580 (Cal. 1873).
Opinion
The motion for a new trial was granted upon the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. There was a conflict of testimony upon the issues submitted to the jury, and in such case it is settled that this Court will not interfere with the judgment of the Court below. There was no error in retaxing the costs which were allowed to the plaintiff.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hiraide v. Cochran
293 P. 165 (California Court of Appeal, 1930)
In re the Estate of Carriger
37 P. 785 (California Supreme Court, 1894)
Curtiss v. Starr & Co.
24 P. 806 (California Supreme Court, 1890)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
46 Cal. 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higuerra-v-bernal-cal-1873.