Higuerra v. Bernal

California Supreme Court

Higuerra v. Bernal

46 Cal. 580

California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1873·No. No. 3,744·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

The motion for a new trial was granted upon the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. There was a conflict of testimony upon the issues submitted to the jury, and in such case it is settled that this Court will not interfere with the judgment of the Court below. There was no error in retaxing the costs which were allowed to the plaintiff.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

The motion for a new trial was granted upon the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. There was a conflict of testimony upon the issues submitted to the jury, and in such case it is settled that this Court will not interfere with the judgment of the Court below. There was no error in retaxing the costs which were allowed to the plaintiff.

Order affirmed.

Higuerra v. Bernal, 46 Cal. 580 (Cal. 1873).

Pincite

46 Cal. 580 (Higuerra v. Bernal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related