Higman Towing Co. v. Cocrehan
This text of 165 F.2d 789 (Higman Towing Co. v. Cocrehan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It will serve no useful purpose for us to consider and discuss the questions so fully and interestedly presented in appellant’s brief. We regard them as not open to us but as foreclosed by the decisions in Economy Light & Power Co. v. United States, 256 U.S. 113, 41 S.Ct. 409, 65 L.Ed. 847, and Escanaba & Lake Michigan Transp. Co. v. City of Chicago, 107 U.S. 678, 2 S.Ct. 185, 27 L.Ed. 442, and the other cases it cites.
On the authority of those cases, the judgment appealed from, 70 F.Supp. 628, is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 F.2d 789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higman-towing-co-v-cocrehan-ca5-1948.