Higman Towing Co. v. Cocrehan
165 F.2d 789
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 6, 1948·No. No. 12003·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
It will serve no useful purpose for us to consider and discuss the questions so fully and interestedly presented in appellant’s brief. We regard them as not open to us but as foreclosed by the decisions in Economy Light & Power Co. v. United States, 256 U.S. 113, 41 S.Ct. 409, 65 L.Ed. 847, and Escanaba & Lake Michigan Transp. Co. v. City of Chicago, 107 U.S. 678, 2 S.Ct. 185, 27 L.Ed. 442, and the other cases it cites.
On the authority of those cases, the judgment appealed from, 70 F.Supp. 628, is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Higman Towing Co. v. Cocrehan, 165 F.2d 789 (5th Cir. 1948).
165 F.2d 789 (Higman Towing Co. v. Cocrehan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Bair
338 N.W.2d 338 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1983)
State Ex Rel. Battle v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
143 S.E.2d 331 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1965)
American Barge Line Co. v. Koontz
68 S.E.2d 56 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1951)