Higley v. Hornburg
This text of 7 A.D.2d 960 (Higley v. Hornburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and amended judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. (Appeal by defendant McFall from a judgment of Chautauqua Trial Term for plaintiff against all defendants in an automobile negligence action; also appeals by all defendants from an amended judgment dismissing counterclaims of defendants McFall and Harry Homburg.) Present'—MeCurn, P. J., Williams, Bastow, Goldman and Halpern, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 A.D.2d 960, 183 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higley-v-hornburg-nyappdiv-1959.