Highway Technologies, Inc. and Isaias Gutierrez Ramirez v. Rose Barnett and Jerry Barnett

Court of Appeals of Texas

Highway Technologies, Inc. and Isaias Gutierrez Ramirez v. Rose Barnett and Jerry Barnett

DecidedJanuary 13, 2011

Docket13-10-00464-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Highway Technologies, Inc. and Isaias Gutierrez Ramirez v. Rose Barnett and Jerry Barnett (Highway Technologies, Inc. and Isaias Gutierrez Ramirez v. Rose Barnett and Jerry Barnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Highway Technologies, Inc. and Isaias Gutierrez Ramirez v. Rose Barnett and Jerry Barnett, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-10-00464-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND

ISAIAS GUTIERREZ RAMIREZ, Appellants,

v.

ROSE BARNETT AND JERRY BARNETT, Appellees.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

On September 23, 2010, this appeal was abated to allow the parties the opportunity to finalize settlement. This case is before the Court on an agreed motion to lift abatement and vacate the trial court’s judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. The parties have reached an agreement with regard to the disposition of the matters currently on appeal. Pursuant to the agreement, the parties request this Court to vacate the trial court=s judgment and remand this case to the trial court with instructions to dismiss the case with prejudice in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement.

The agreed motion to lift abatement and vacate the trial court’s judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement is GRANTED. The appeal is hereby REINSTATED. Accordingly, we vacate the trial court=s judgment without regard to the merits, and REMAND this case to the trial court with instructions to dismiss the case with prejudice in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

Costs will be taxed against appellants. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

13th day of January, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-10-00464-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND

ISAIAS GUTIERREZ RAMIREZ, Appellants,

v.

ROSE BARNETT AND JERRY BARNETT, Appellees.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

On September 23, 2010, this appeal was abated to allow the parties the opportunity to finalize settlement. This case is before the Court on an agreed motion to lift abatement and vacate the trial court’s judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. The parties have reached an agreement with regard to the disposition of the matters currently on appeal. Pursuant to the agreement, the parties request this Court to vacate the trial court=s judgment and remand this case to the trial court with instructions to dismiss the case with prejudice in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement.

The agreed motion to lift abatement and vacate the trial court’s judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement is GRANTED. The appeal is hereby REINSTATED. Accordingly, we vacate the trial court=s judgment without regard to the merits, and REMAND this case to the trial court with instructions to dismiss the case with prejudice in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

Costs will be taxed against appellants. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

13th day of January, 2011.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Highway Technologies, Inc. and Isaias Gutierrez Ramirez v. Rose Barnett and Jerry Barnett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/highway-technologies-inc-and-isaias-gutierrez-rami-texapp-2011.