Hightower v. State
This text of 5 S.W. 343 (Hightower v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An indictment or information for the offense of swindling, to be valid1, must allege that the injured party was induced to part with the ownership of the property acquired by the defendant by means of the false pretenses, etc., stated in said indictment or information. (Mathena v. The State, 15 Texas Ct. App., 473.)
In this case the information contains no such allegation, and is, therefore, substantially defective; wherefore the judgment is reversed and the prosecution is dismissed.
Reversed and dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 S.W. 343, 23 Tex. Ct. App. 451, 1887 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hightower-v-state-texapp-1887.