Hightower v. State
324 So. 2d 163, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 19040
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hightower v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 301 So. 2d 504 →
Opinion
Appellant, charged with breaking and entering a building with intent to commit a misdemeanor, was convicted of entering without breaking a building with intent to commit a misdemeanor. Relying upon Pettigrew v. State, 316 So.2d 69 (2nd DCA Fla.1975); O’Neal v. State, 308 So.2d 569 (2nd DCA Fla.1975), and Skov v. State, 292 So.2d 64 (2nd DCA Fla.1974), he contends that this is fundamental error. The cited cases have been expressly overruled. See Roberts v. State, 320 So.2d 832 (2nd DCA Fla.1975).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hightower v. State, 324 So. 2d 163, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 19040 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).
324 So. 2d 163 (Hightower v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Skov v. State
292 So. 2d 64 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
O'NEAL v. State
308 So. 2d 569 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Roberts v. State
320 So. 2d 832 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Pettigrew v. State
316 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)