Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hightower v. State

Hightower v. State

324 So. 2d 163, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 19040
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 19, 1975
DocketNo. 75-474
StatusPublished

This text of 324 So. 2d 163 (Hightower v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hightower v. State, 324 So. 2d 163, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 19040 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, charged with breaking and entering a building with intent to commit a misdemeanor, was convicted of entering without breaking a building with intent to commit a misdemeanor. Relying upon Pettigrew v. State, 316 So.2d 69 (2nd DCA Fla.1975); O’Neal v. State, 308 So.2d 569 (2nd DCA Fla.1975), and Skov v. State, 292 So.2d 64 (2nd DCA Fla.1974), he contends that this is fundamental error. The cited cases have been expressly overruled. See Roberts v. State, 320 So.2d 832 (2nd DCA Fla.1975).

Affirmed.

OWEN, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Skov v. State
292 So. 2d 64 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
O'NEAL v. State
308 So. 2d 569 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Roberts v. State
320 So. 2d 832 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Pettigrew v. State
316 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
324 So. 2d 163, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 19040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hightower-v-state-fladistctapp-1975.