Hightower v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

67 Mo. 726
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedApril 15, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 67 Mo. 726 (Hightower v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hightower v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co., 67 Mo. 726 (Mo. 1878).

Opinion

Napton, J.

— The injury to the plaintiff’s farm in this ease was occasioned by the same fire heretofore referred to in the case of Poeppers v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co. The case was tried, however, in a different county and before a different judge. The instructions in this case, it will be seen from a copy of them in the statement, are as favorable to the defendant as could have been asked. The question of an intervention of a new cause of damage between the original fire and its ultimate destruction of plaintiff’s property is clearly put to the jury, and they are told that, if the wind on the morning succeeding the fire was an extraordinary one, the defendant? was entitled to a verdict. The judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.
179 N.W. 45 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1920)
Ft. Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. Arthur
124 S.W. 213 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Mo. 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hightower-v-missouri-kansas-texas-railway-co-mo-1878.