Hightower v. Gossett & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hightower v. Gossett & Co.

120 S.E. 20, 31 Ga. App. 109, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 755

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 13, 1923

Docket14770

StatusPublished

This text of 120 S.E. 20 (Hightower v. Gossett & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hightower v. Gossett & Co., 120 S.E. 20, 31 Ga. App. 109, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 755 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

This is a suit upon an accepted written order to pay a

certain sum of money. The only legal defense set up in the defendant’s plea was that of failure of consideration, and the trial judge did not err in striking, on the plaintiff’s motion, the other portions of the plea.

The assignments of error other than the one dealt with above are not referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and therefore are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworlh, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI