Hightower v. George

26 S.E. 729, 102 Ga. 549, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 545
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 5, 1897·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. Where in term time an order is passed directing that a mot-ion for new trial then pending be heard and determined at a day named in vacation, and time is given by the presiding judge until that date within which to perfect the brief of evidence, and have the same approved, and where upon the day thus named a brief of evidence is presented to and approved by the judge, and he thereupon orders the same filed, a motion made at the hearing to dismiss the motion for a new trial, upon the ground that no brief of evidence has been filed as required by law, is properly overruled. * f

2. This being a writ of error from the grant of a first new, trial, and there being a conflict of evidence, the discretion of the trial judge will not be controlled. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hightower v. George, 26 S.E. 729, 102 Ga. 549, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 545 (Ga. 1897).

26 S.E. 729 (Hightower v. George) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chandler v. Chandler
11 S.E.2d 666 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Humphries v. Morris
175 S.E. 242 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Cross v. Coffin-Fletcher Packing Co.
51 S.E. 704 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Johnson v. Grantham
34 S.E. 851 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Whitton v. Reid
34 S.E. 309 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Martin v. Monroe
33 S.E. 62 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Malsby & Avery v. Young
30 S.E. 854 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)