Hightower v. George
This text of 26 S.E. 729 (Hightower v. George) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where in term time an order is passed directing that a mot-ion for new trial then pending be heard and determined at a day named in vacation, and time is given by the presiding judge until that date within which to perfect the brief of evidence, and have the same approved, and where upon the day thus named a brief of evidence is presented to and approved by the judge, and he thereupon orders the same filed, a motion made at the hearing to dismiss the motion for a new trial, upon the ground that no brief of evidence has been filed as required by law, is properly overruled. * f
2. This being a writ of error from the grant of a first new, trial, and there being a conflict of evidence, the discretion of the trial judge will not be controlled. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 S.E. 729, 102 Ga. 549, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hightower-v-george-ga-1897.