Hight v. McCoy

46 App. D.C. 238, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2534
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMarch 31, 1917
DocketNo. 475
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 46 App. D.C. 238 (Hight v. McCoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hight v. McCoy, 46 App. D.C. 238, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2534 (D.C. Cir. 1917).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is an application for a writ of mandamus to Mr. Justice McCoy, of the supreme court of the District of Columbia, to compel him to sign, allow, and make part of the record a proposed bill of exceptions for and on behalf of the said C. B. Hight.

It appears that the bill of exceptions, as it is entitled, was submitted to Justice McCoy after the final decree had been rendered in the case, and that he refused to sign it because in his opinion it was not -prepared in accordance with the rules of this court relating to statements of evidence in equity causes..

This court has no power to compel a trial justice to do any[239]*239thing more than consider a bill of exceptions. It cannot compel him to sign a bill which has been tendered which, in his opinion, is not in conformity with the rules. It is an act of judicial discretion which this court cannot control.

It is considered, therefore, that it is unnecessary to issue a rule in this ease, and that the petition he dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clawans v. District of Columbia
89 F.2d 802 (District of Columbia, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 App. D.C. 238, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hight-v-mccoy-cadc-1917.