Hight, Ex Parte Benjamin Michael

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 20, 2006
DocketAP-75,507
StatusPublished

This text of Hight, Ex Parte Benjamin Michael (Hight, Ex Parte Benjamin Michael) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hight, Ex Parte Benjamin Michael, (Tex. 2006).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. AP-75,507
EX PARTE BENJAMIN MICHAEL HIGHT, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 03-34356-U IN THE 291
ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to solicitation of a child and was sentenced to two years' imprisonment.

This Court remanded to the trial court for findings regarding Applicant's claim that his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered because he was not advised that he would have to register as a sex offender. On remand, the trial court found that although the plea agreement and admonition referred to attached admonitions to sex offenders, no such admonitions were attached or were contained anywhere in Applicant's file. Furthermore, trial counsel provided an affidavit, stating that his files did not contain any indication that he discussed the sex offender registration requirements with Applicant, or that Applicant knew of the requirements from any other source.

We order that this application be filed and set for submission to determine whether this case is distinguishable from Mitschke v. State, 129 S.W.3d 130 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) and Anderson v. State, 182 S.W.3d 914 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006), in which this Court found that failure to admonish as to sex offender registration requirements was harmless error under the facts of those cases. The parties shall brief the issue.

Further, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and desires to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art 26.04. The trial court shall send to this Court, within 60 days of the date of this order, a supplemental transcript containing either the order appointing counsel or a statement that Applicant is not indigent. All briefs shall be filed with this Court on or before December 19, 2006.



Filed: September 20, 2006

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mitschke v. State
129 S.W.3d 130 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2004)
Anderson v. State
182 S.W.3d 914 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hight, Ex Parte Benjamin Michael, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hight-ex-parte-benjamin-michael-texcrimapp-2006.