Highsmith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Highsmith v. State

508 So. 2d 1289, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1453, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8934

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 11, 1987·No. No. BN-495·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s convictions and sentences are affirmed. Hester v. State, 503 So.2d 1346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). We again certify the questions set out in Mitchell v. State, 507 So.2d 686 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Fryson v. State, 506 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) and VanTassell v. State, 498 So.2d 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), as questions of great public importance.

SHIVERS, THOMPSON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s convictions and sentences are affirmed. Hester v. State, 503 So.2d 1346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). We again certify the questions set out in Mitchell v. State, 507 So.2d 686 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Fryson v. State, 506 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) and VanTassell v. State, 498 So.2d 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), as questions of great public importance.

SHIVERS, THOMPSON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Highsmith v. State, 508 So. 2d 1289, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1453, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8934 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

508 So. 2d 1289 (Highsmith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related