Highsmith v. State

508 So. 2d 1289, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1453, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8934
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 11, 1987
DocketNo. BN-495
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 508 So. 2d 1289 (Highsmith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Highsmith v. State, 508 So. 2d 1289, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1453, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8934 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s convictions and sentences are affirmed. Hester v. State, 503 So.2d 1346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). We again certify the questions set out in Mitchell v. State, 507 So.2d 686 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Fryson v. State, 506 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) and VanTassell v. State, 498 So.2d 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), as questions of great public importance.

SHIVERS, THOMPSON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Highsmith v. State
522 So. 2d 340 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
508 So. 2d 1289, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1453, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/highsmith-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.