Highsmith v. Moffitt

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Highsmith v. Moffitt

101 S.E. 917, 24 Ga. App. 690, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 458

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 27, 1920

Docket10957

StatusPublished

This text of 101 S.E. 917 (Highsmith v. Moffitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Highsmith v. Moffitt, 101 S.E. 917, 24 Ga. App. 690, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 458 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The petition as amended set out a cause of action and was not subject to any ground of demurrer interposed.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

The defendant demurred to the petition generally and specially, the demurrer was overruled, and he excepted.

Seabroolc & Kennedy, for plaintiff in error,

cited: 113 Ga. 80; 137 Ga. 704; 106 Ga. 568; 21 Ga. App. 602; 7 Ga. App. 584; [693]*69378 Ga. 260; 92 Ga. 495; 134 Ga. 713; 1 Labatt, M. &. S. 394 and cit.

Osborne, Lawrence & Abrahams, D. 8. Atkinson, contra,

cited: Civil Code (1910), § 3130; 88 Ga. 286 (2); 9 Ga. App. 738 (2); Shearman & Redf. Neg. (6th ed.) 621, 637, §§ 217, 219a; Labatt, M. & S. (2d ed.), §§ 1321-2, 1329-31; 129 Ga. 688; 127 Ga. 404; 98 Ga. 655; 5 Ga. App. 223 (2); 13 Ga. App. 799, 817; 1 Ga. App. 403. Distinguished: 92 Ga. 495; 134 Ga. 713.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI