Highsmith v. Macfadyen

135 S. Ct. 1729, 191 L. Ed. 2d 674, 83 U.S.L.W. 3762, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 2245
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 30, 2015
DocketNo. 14–8080.
StatusPublished

This text of 135 S. Ct. 1729 (Highsmith v. Macfadyen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Highsmith v. Macfadyen, 135 S. Ct. 1729, 191 L. Ed. 2d 674, 83 U.S.L.W. 3762, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 2245 (U.S. 2015).

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperisdenied. Petitioner allowed until April 20, 2015, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 S. Ct. 1729, 191 L. Ed. 2d 674, 83 U.S.L.W. 3762, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 2245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/highsmith-v-macfadyen-scotus-2015.