Highsmith v. Cone

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Highsmith v. Cone

226 S.E.2d 130, 138 Ga. App. 330, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2148

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 5, 1976

Docket51767

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 226 S.E.2d 130 (Highsmith v. Cone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Highsmith v. Cone, 226 S.E.2d 130, 138 Ga. App. 330, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2148 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Stolz, Judge.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment sustaining the defendant’s motion to dismiss his complaint for damages based on alleged malicious prosecution. The complaint alleged that the defendant caused a public indecency warrant to. be issued against him, which resulted in his arrest and imprisonment; that the warrant was finally disposed of in his favor by being dead docketed; and that the prosecution was carried out without any probable cause. Held:

The case is controlled adversely to the plaintiff by the decision of this court in Courtenay v. Randolph, 125 Ga. App. 581 (188 SE2d 396).

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Clark, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI