Highnote v. Vickery

Indiana Supreme Court

Highnote v. Vickery

17 Ind. 136, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 324

DecidedNovember 29, 1861

StatusPublished

This text of 17 Ind. 136 (Highnote v. Vickery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Highnote v. Vickery, 17 Ind. 136, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 324 (Ind. 1861).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Suit commenced before a justice. Judgment for defendants. Appeal by plaintiff. Judgment in the Circuit Court for plaintiff, for two dollars damages, and two dollars costs. Motion, by the plaintiff, that judgment be [137]*137entered in Ms favor, for full costs. Motion overruled. The record does not contain the evidence. We are of opinion that the motion, as to costs, should have been sustained.

G. G. Nave, and Burns <& Glesner, for the appellant, William R. Harrison, for the appellees.

The judgment, as to costs, is reversed. Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Suit commenced before a justice. Judgment for defendants. Appeal by plaintiff. Judgment in the Circuit Court for plaintiff, for two dollars damages, and two dollars costs. Motion, by the plaintiff, that judgment be [137]*137entered in Ms favor, for full costs. Motion overruled. The record does not contain the evidence. We are of opinion that the motion, as to costs, should have been sustained.

G. G. Nave, and Burns <& Glesner, for the appellant, William R. Harrison, for the appellees.

The judgment, as to costs, is reversed. Cause remanded, &c.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Ind. 136, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/highnote-v-vickery-ind-1861.