HIGHLAND PARK POLICEMEN & FIREMEN RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. City of Highland Park
725 N.W.2d 460
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 10, 2007
Docket131778. COA No. 252424
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 725 N.W.2d 460 (HIGHLAND PARK POLICEMEN & FIREMEN RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. City of Highland Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
HIGHLAND PARK POLICEMEN & FIREMEN RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. City of Highland Park, 725 N.W.2d 460 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
HIGHLAND PARK POLICEMEN & FIREMEN RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellee, and
Highland Park Retired Police & Firemen Association, Intervening Plaintiff, and
Charles Harper, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, Highland Park Finance Director, Highland Park Treasurer, Highland Park City Clerk, and Highland Park City Counsel, Defendants-Appellees, and
Highland Park Emergency Financial Manager, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 22, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
ALLGAIER v. City of Warren
725 N.W.2d 460 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
725 N.W.2d 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/highland-park-policemen-firemen-retirement-system-v-city-of-highland-mich-2007.