Highers v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Highers v. State

1959 OK CR 35, 337 P.2d 1112, 1959 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 197

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 1, 1959

DocketA-12668

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 1959 OK CR 35 (Highers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Highers v. State, 1959 OK CR 35, 337 P.2d 1112, 1959 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 197 (Okla. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

BRETT, Judge.

Plaintiff in error, Steve Highers, defendant below, was charged by indictment in the District Court of Muskogee County, Oklahoma, with the crime of subornation of perjury. He was tried by a jury, convicted, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of eighteen months. Judgment and sentence were entered accordingly, from which this appeal has been perfected.

This appeal is a companion case to Hammers v. State, Okl.Cr., 337 P.2d 1097, decided this same day. The principal con *1117 tentions presented herein are the same as decided in Hammers v. State, supra, the indictment here in question being- returned by the same grand jury. Therefore, the opinions expressed and the conclusions reached in Hammers v. State, supra, are fully adopted herein. The judgment and sentence is accordingly reversed and remanded.

POWELL, P. J., and NIX, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRETT, Judge.

Plaintiff in error, Steve Highers, defendant below, was charged by indictment in the District Court of Muskogee County, Oklahoma, with the crime of subornation of perjury. He was tried by a jury, convicted, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of eighteen months. Judgment and sentence were entered accordingly, from which this appeal has been perfected.

This appeal is a companion case to Hammers v. State, Okl.Cr., 337 P.2d 1097, decided this same day. The principal con *1117 tentions presented herein are the same as decided in Hammers v. State, supra, the indictment here in question being- returned by the same grand jury. Therefore, the opinions expressed and the conclusions reached in Hammers v. State, supra, are fully adopted herein. The judgment and sentence is accordingly reversed and remanded.

POWELL, P. J., and NIX, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1959 OK CR 35, 337 P.2d 1112, 1959 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/highers-v-state-oklacrimapp-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack