High v. Wilson

New York Supreme Court

High v. Wilson

2 Johns. 45

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 15, 1806

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Johns. 45 (High v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

High v. Wilson, 2 Johns. 45 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant now produces the record of the judgment to show that it supported the fieri facias. It is settled, that when a stranger sues the sheriff', the latter must produce the judgment as well as the writ, to justify his seizure. The defendant in this case did' not produce the judgment at the trial. But we are all-clearly of opinion that the plaintiff had no right of action, for the sale of the horse was evidently fraudulent. On the authority of the case of Masten v. Podger,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant now produces the record of the judgment to show that it supported the fieri facias. It is settled, that when a stranger sues the sheriff', the latter must produce the judgment as well as the writ, to justify his seizure. The defendant in this case did' not produce the judgment at the trial. But we are all-clearly of opinion that the plaintiff had no right of action, for the sale of the horse was evidently fraudulent. On the authority of the case of Masten v. Podger,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Johns. 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/high-v-wilson-nysupct-1806.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack