High v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

High v. State

516 So. 2d 275, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2464, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10676, 1987 WL 1031

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 23, 1987

DocketNo. 86-411

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 516 So. 2d 275 (High v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

High v. State, 516 So. 2d 275, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2464, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10676, 1987 WL 1031 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence presented to convict him of manslaughter. The charges resulted from an automobile accident in which three people died.

Appellant contends that proof of excessive speed alone is not sufficient to prove the culpable negligence necessary to sustain a manslaughter conviction. Appellant relies chiefly on Johnson v. State, 92 So.2d 651 (Fla.1957) and Filmon v. State, 336 So.2d 586 (Fla.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 980, 97 S.Ct. 1675, 52 L.Ed.2d 375 (1977), reh. denied, 431 U.S. 960, 97 S.Ct. 2689, 53 L.Ed.2d 279 (1977). The holding in Johnson, however, is actually the “flip-side” of appellant’s argument that speed alone is insufficient. The Johnson court stated: “It cannot be stated as an absolute rule that speed alone cannot amount to manslaughter. Too much depends on the attendant circumstances.” 92 So.2d at 653. Likewise, in Filmon, 336 So.2d at 590, the court talks of the “totality of the circumstances surrounding the incident....”

We conclude in this case that there were sufficient other circumstances and conduct by appellant, other than speed, to support the conviction for manslaughter. This case is clearly distinguishable from Brown v. State, 511 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) where this court found “the complete record in this case presents us with absolutely no evidence of any of these factors except the 30 m.p.h. speed limit.”

Affirmed.

DANAHY, C.J., and HALL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence presented to convict him of manslaughter. The charges resulted from an automobile accident in which three people died.

Appellant contends that proof of excessive speed alone is not sufficient to prove the culpable negligence necessary to sustain a manslaughter conviction. Appellant relies chiefly on Johnson v. State, 92 So.2d 651 (Fla.1957) and Filmon v. State, 336 So.2d 586 (Fla.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 980, 97 S.Ct. 1675, 52 L.Ed.2d 375 (1977), reh. denied, 431 U.S. 960, 97 S.Ct. 2689, 53 L.Ed.2d 279 (1977). The holding in Johnson, however, is actually the “flip-side” of appellant’s argument that speed alone is insufficient. The Johnson court stated: “It cannot be stated as an absolute rule that speed alone cannot amount to manslaughter. Too much depends on the attendant circumstances.” 92 So.2d at 653. Likewise, in Filmon, 336 So.2d at 590, the court talks of the “totality of the circumstances surrounding the incident....”

We conclude in this case that there were sufficient other circumstances and conduct by appellant, other than speed, to support the conviction for manslaughter. This case is clearly distinguishable from Brown v. State, 511 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) where this court found “the complete record in this case presents us with absolutely no evidence of any of these factors except the 30 m.p.h. speed limit.”

Affirmed.

DANAHY, C.J., and HALL, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

516 So. 2d 275, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2464, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10676, 1987 WL 1031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/high-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack