High v. Reuters America, Inc.

19 A.D.3d 284, 796 N.Y.S.2d 919, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7016
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 23, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 A.D.3d 284 (High v. Reuters America, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
High v. Reuters America, Inc., 19 A.D.3d 284, 796 N.Y.S.2d 919, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7016 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Nelson S. Roman, J.), entered August 17, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from, denied enforcement of a so-ordered stipulation of settlement, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

As correctly found by the IAS court, the stipulation reached in open court on December 4, 2003 did not create a binding contract, inasmuch as it was expressly contingent upon the parties entering into a mutually agreeable settlement in writing, which did not occur (see Matter of Meister, 43 AD2d 41 [1973], appeals dismissed 34 NY2d 698 [1974]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reyes v. Sequeira
68 A.D.3d 526 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 A.D.3d 284, 796 N.Y.S.2d 919, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7016, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/high-v-reuters-america-inc-nyappdiv-2005.