High v. Morgan
This text of High v. Morgan (High v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6249
JERRY LYNN HIGH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DIANA MORGAN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-03-799)
Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 17, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Lynn High, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Jerry Lynn High appeals the district court’s judgment
dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as frivolous for the reasons
stated by the district court. See High v. Morgan, No. CA-03-799
(E.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
High v. Morgan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/high-v-morgan-ca4-2004.