High v. City of White Plains

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

High v. City of White Plains

227 A.D.2d 525, 658 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5400

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 20, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 227 A.D.2d 525 (High v. City of White Plains) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

High v. City of White Plains, 227 A.D.2d 525, 658 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5400 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by the appellant-respondent County of Westchester, on an appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered January 5, 1995, (2) a resettled order of the same court dated February 3, 1995, and (3) an order of the same court entered June 6, 1995, respectively, to strike Exhibits 1 through 4 to the respondent-appellant’s reply brief on the ground that those exhibits contain matter dehors the record. By decision and order of this Court dated January 18, 1996, the motion was held in abeyance and referred to the Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission of the appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is denied, since the exhibits at issue, although not submitted to the court of first instance, are matters of public record that may be judicially noticed (see, Brandes Meat Corp. v Cromer, 146 AD2d 666, 667; see also, Crawford v Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 35 NY2d 291, 298-299). Balletta, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by the appellant-respondent County of Westchester, on an appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered January 5, 1995, (2) a resettled order of the same court dated February 3, 1995, and (3) an order of the same court entered June 6, 1995, respectively, to strike Exhibits 1 through 4 to the respondent-appellant’s reply brief on the ground that those exhibits contain matter dehors the record. By decision and order of this Court dated January 18, 1996, the motion was held in abeyance and referred to the Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission of the appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is denied, since the exhibits at issue, although not submitted to the court of first instance, are matters of public record that may be judicially noticed (see, Brandes Meat Corp. v Cromer, 146 AD2d 666, 667; see also, Crawford v Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 35 NY2d 291, 298-299). Balletta, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 A.D.2d 525, 658 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/high-v-city-of-white-plains-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack