High v. Brasch

114 So. 2d 796
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided August 5, 1959·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected our apparent jurisdiction; thus we issued the writ and heard oral argument. [797]*797After hearing argument, and upon further consideration of the briefs filed herein, we conclude that there is, in fact, no direct conflict between the decision brought here for review1 and former decisions of this court or another district court of appeal, as contended in the petition.

Therefore, this court being without jurisdiction in the matter, the writ heretofore issued must be, and is, quashed and the cause dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, HOBSON, ROBERTS and DREW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

High v. Brasch, 114 So. 2d 796 (Fla. 1959).

114 So. 2d 796 (High v. Brasch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burden v. Dickman
547 So. 2d 170 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Palm Beach Towers, Inc. v. Korn
400 So. 2d 110 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)