High Point Sprinkler Co. of Atlanta, Inc. v. George Hyman Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

High Point Sprinkler Co. of Atlanta, Inc. v. George Hyman Construction Co.

286 S.E.2d 763, 160 Ga. App. 192, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 3028

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 27, 1981

Docket62746

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 286 S.E.2d 763 (High Point Sprinkler Co. of Atlanta, Inc. v. George Hyman Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

High Point Sprinkler Co. of Atlanta, Inc. v. George Hyman Construction Co., 286 S.E.2d 763, 160 Ga. App. 192, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 3028 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Banke, Judge.

This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment for the plaintiff contractor in a suit to recover for breach of a subcontract. The case was tried without a jury. In ruling for the plaintiff, the court made no findings of fact, but merely concluded as a matter of law that the contract was valid, that the defendants were bound by it, and that the plaintiff had incurred $80,374.30 in damages as the result of the defendants’ failure to perform. Held:

The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for entry of proper findings of fact and conclusions of law as to all material issues, as required by Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a). See Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 234 Ga. 261 (215 SE2d 471) (1975); Spivey v. Mayson, 124 Ga. App. 775 (186 SE2d 154) (1971); Barkwell v. Helms, 137 Ga. App. 290 (223 SE2d 485) (1976).

Judgment vacated and case remanded.

Deen, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI