High Performance STL v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

High Performance STL v. Division of Employment Security

534 S.W.3d 402

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 7, 2017·No. WD 80566·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Per curiam:

High Performance STL'appeals from a decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found that workers engaged as volleyball coaches performed services for High Performance in “employment,” and for “wages,” within the meaning of sections 288.034 and 288.036, respectively. High Performance argues that there was not sufficient competent evidence in the record to support the Commission’s decision. We affirm the Commission’s decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per curiam:

High Performance STL'appeals from a decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found that workers engaged as volleyball coaches performed services for High Performance in “employment,” and for “wages,” within the meaning of sections 288.034 and 288.036, respectively. High Performance argues that there was not sufficient competent evidence in the record to support the Commission’s decision. We affirm the Commission’s decision. Rule 84.16(b).

High Performance STL v. Division of Employment Security, 534 S.W.3d 402 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

534 S.W.3d 402 (High Performance STL v. Division of Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.