High Performance STL v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

High Performance STL v. Division of Employment Security

534 S.W.3d 402

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 7, 2017

DocketWD 80566

StatusPublished

This text of 534 S.W.3d 402 (High Performance STL v. Division of Employment Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

High Performance STL v. Division of Employment Security, 534 S.W.3d 402 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Per curiam:

High Performance STL'appeals from a decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found that workers engaged as volleyball coaches performed services for High Performance in “employment,” and for “wages,” within the meaning of sections 288.034 and 288.036, respectively. High Performance argues that there was not sufficient competent evidence in the record to support the Commission’s decision. We affirm the Commission’s decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per curiam:

High Performance STL'appeals from a decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found that workers engaged as volleyball coaches performed services for High Performance in “employment,” and for “wages,” within the meaning of sections 288.034 and 288.036, respectively. High Performance argues that there was not sufficient competent evidence in the record to support the Commission’s decision. We affirm the Commission’s decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

534 S.W.3d 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/high-performance-stl-v-division-of-employment-security-moctapp-2017.