High Definition MRI, P.C. v. Liberty Mut. Holding Co., Inc.

2017 NY Slip Op 1799, 148 A.D.3d 470, 48 N.Y.S.3d 576
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 2017·No. 650721/13 3171 3170·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert R. Reed, J.), entered May 11, 2016, dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, the judgment vacated, and the complaint reinstated, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered February 4, 2016, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, unanimously dismissed, without costs as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

Contrary to the motion court’s conclusion, the breach of contract action against defendants Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Safeco Insurance Company of America, Inc., and Indiana Insurance Company provides adequate notice of the transactions and occurrences intended to be proved (see CPLR 3013), and the cause of action for a declaration that defendants’ claim-handling processes are unlawful and that plaintiff is properly incorporated states a cause of action for declaratory relief (see State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Anikeyeva, 89 AD3d 1009, 1010 [2d Dept 2011]).

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz, Fein-man and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

High Definition MRI, P.C. v. Liberty Mut. Holding Co., Inc., 2017 NY Slip Op 1799, 148 A.D.3d 470, 48 N.Y.S.3d 576 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 1799 (High Definition MRI, P.C. v. Liberty Mut. Holding Co., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Anikeyeva
89 A.D.3d 1009 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)