High & Co. v. Candler

33 S.E. 629, 105 Ga. 487, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 593
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 28, 1898·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

UTish, X

This court has no jurisdiction to entertain or pass upon assignments of error in a copy bill of exceptions, when the record affirmatively discloses that the order purporting to establish such copy was, over the objection of the defendant in error, granted At chambers by a judge who, because of his disqualification, did not preside in the trial of the case to which the original bill of exceptions related. Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

High & Co. v. Candler, 33 S.E. 629, 105 Ga. 487, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 593 (Ga. 1898).

33 S.E. 629 (High & Co. v. Candler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of Norman Park v. Colquitt County
150 S.E. 841 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)