High & Co. v. Candler

33 S.E. 629, 105 Ga. 487, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 593
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 28, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 S.E. 629 (High & Co. v. Candler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
High & Co. v. Candler, 33 S.E. 629, 105 Ga. 487, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 593 (Ga. 1898).

Opinion

UTish, X

This court has no jurisdiction to entertain or pass upon assignments of error in a copy bill of exceptions, when the record affirmatively discloses that the order purporting to establish such copy was, over the objection of the defendant in error, granted At chambers by a judge who, because of his disqualification, did not preside in the trial of the case to which the original bill of exceptions related. Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bank of Norman Park v. Colquitt County
150 S.E. 841 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 S.E. 629, 105 Ga. 487, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/high-co-v-candler-ga-1898.