Higgs v. State
826 S.W.2d 86, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 143, 1992 WL 11226
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals from an order denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. The motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Higgs v. State, 826 S.W.2d 86, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 143, 1992 WL 11226 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).
826 S.W.2d 86 (Higgs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.